It was bound to happen- tcam & baiting - Page 18 - Utah Wildlife Network

» Site Navigation
» Home
 > Search
 > FAQ
» Stats
Members: 14,434
Threads: 64,257
Posts: 692,379
Welcome to our newest member, Laneyanderson
Like Tree157Likes
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2021, 04:20 PM   #171 (permalink)
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 500

Originally Posted by caddis8 View Post
Interesting. I thought it was.
Do you know how many confrontations in the field I’ve seen started by guys who just absolutely KNEW laws were being broken, when it turned out that they had no clue what was really the law? There’s be less fighting to begin with it guys sat down and read the field regs once a year. But oh know, they just know what the laws are.

I had a dude try to rip me out of my treestand one afternoon when he “caught” me sitting over a salt block. Which was “illegal” in Utah. Always had been! . They should make you sit down a read the proclamation before they issue you your tags every year.
MooseMeat is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Old 02-20-2021, 01:21 PM   #172 (permalink)
Junior Member
landerman's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9

Not much discussion about the waterfowl language in the bill. It originally prohibited guides and outfitters taking clients onto WMAs. Good move, I’ve seen an increase in that type of activity at FB. Didn’t take the guides and outfitters long to get to the bill sponsor. Latest revision now allows such practice with a permit approved by the Wildlife Board, and we all know who the Wildlife Board listens to. Of course they’ll make the argument that guides and outfitters take clients big game hunting on public property, so why shouldn’t they be able to do the same thing in WMAs. Big difference, millions of acres versus hundreds of acres. Now the average waterfowl hunter will have to continue to compete with outfitters for the limited choice spots on our WMAs. Just my two cents worth...
landerman is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-21-2021, 08:55 PM   #173 (permalink)
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 2

I think this is pretty fair and reasonable.
Substantialpart is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Utah Wildlife Network forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.